What must be done

A neutron bomb would destroy all matter. Not good.

We have H-Bombs, and those aren't really "economically viable" to put in tank shells

Particle accelerators aren't weapons. They're for making experimental new elements.

 

Nude chics :-*

 

Man talk about vague jokes. that was lame!

 

I preferred the old tanks and bunkers, but tbh obviously the graphics are gonna be different and I'm not gonna be that bothered if that's how they are in the game!

 

The funny part is, it's his only post. Ever.

 

I don't really like the new siege tank's look as well, but I like their mode switching animations better. It makes more sense to quickly spread its leg than have 2 retrackable arms slowly reaching out, like those 2 small retrackable arms would really help me if it was real life, they'll probably get blown off.

For the battle cruiser, I really wouldn't want an "epic" death animation, that'll just lag SC2 and many people who upgrading their older computers just for SC2 and they wouldn't want to spend too much. As far as fire power goes, I don't think its a good idea adding rockets. Battlecruisers are known for having lots of laser cannons attached to it, that's why I don't mind seeing the new BC quickly shooting 8 lasers. I like the new BC's look, most of SC2's units matches the cinematics and real pictures (non sprites) better than the older units and people don't seem to notice that.

Some of you guys (no offense though) are just pulling throwing out bad ideas and expecting it to be good.

 

I love how the Battlecruiser looks and attacks, to be honest...

Hoever, what i'de like to see done is...
- Replacement unit for the Overseer
- Replacement for unit the Changeling
- More organic looking Zerg (Mucus, slimey shine, etc.)

 

1) I agree that the siege tank looks like it has been castrated - where did that giant Arclite cannon go? Give me back my 10 foot rod! Ahem..

2) Battlecruisers are fine. "Space vessels" and air units in Starcraft have always been tactically shrunken to be usable on a battlefield that is predominantly land based. That's why ten marines with gauss rifles can shoot down a Battlecruiser. It isn't designed to be realistic, it is designed to be balanced. Additionally, the fact that BC's can now target multiple units / fire several times in rapid succession is a nice perk. I imagine they are going to be roughly equivalent to flying Colossi, except with a Yamato Gun upgrade also making them viable for long range siege / burst damage.

 

i think the tank looks just fnie, maybe a bit more metallic, the siege mode though imo looks incredible.

as for the battlecruiser. its a very nice thing to have, sure a lazer, but its a super lazer!!
i do agree that when it dies it should have more of a *BOOOOOOM* instead of a *ping*

-Zerks

 

Just say "no" to necroposts, friends.