Unit Clarifications

Yes I know, but he talks of different queens in different versions.

 

This is from IGN reports which responding the Korean build. See the red letters. Compare it with what you know from your own reportnot sure if it is from sc2forum, but surely from America)

and this:

This is the Queen in Chinese build. You see the difference?

Edit: edited the color, for bold is quite insignificant here.

 

No, the eggs are sunken clusters... thats just because its very hard to translate such words. And please read the forum rules, never quote more then you write.

 

well...in SCL we got the T1 Queen's stats like this:

HP:160
Max Energy: 100
Minerals: 150
Vespene: 25
Supply: none

however,from the pictures and videos we got from Korea,T1 Queen doesn't need any gases.Only 150 Minerals required.

and also...from here: http://www.starcraft2forum.org/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=47&topic=6377.0 , we can see the Regeneration is a Tier 1 ability,but yesterday in China Beijing,my workmates found that Regeneration was moved to Tier2.

 

You see that in IGN there are two kinds of defending things, one is said to be egg and another insect, that is one point.

P.S. I am really having difficulty finding the forum rule... And you know these quoting are required to make my points clear. Much more differences between three builds have been discovered, and we are sure about them, for reports of one certain build supports some common facts, but those which reports about different builds contradicts a lot.

Edit: Finally found the rule.

 

Show me those pictures, show me those links. Perhaps they changed the builds, but this topic was about the american build, so make your own topic about this, because this is going off-topic.
Egg and insect, you know how hard it is to translate?

 

it just getting worst. now the thor only have 300hp. next thing they will do is rename it to goliath.

 

A Goliath with 300 hp would be FAR better than a Thor with 300 hp, don't you think?

 

1.Pics of screens are not allowed to be taken on these conferences, if you read any of these reports throughoutly; all pics on which you can see the details actually violated Blizzard's rules, and therefore only few of these exists.

2. You want links, I give links:
IGN one:
http://pc.ign.com/articles/858/858170p1.html
American one above: (right on this site)
http://www.starcraft2forum.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=100&Itemid=60
Chinese ones: I am almost sure you cannot read Chinese, so here is my translation:
http://www.starcraft-source.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=2683

3. Yes, I am a translator, so I am sure no translator will announce the same ability twice with different terms and on different stages; furthermore, IGN report is not translated, but written by Charles Onyett.

4. Ok, I should really thank you for your speaking "but this topic was about the american build", for you agree with me that there are different builds. I mean nothing off-topic ---- you see, I am right talking about "there are more than one build so no need to clarify anything".

Edit: insulting sentences deleted. So now who is off-topic?

 

yogomove you sound like a really friendly guy dont you?
Perhaps you should take it a bit more with ease, and have respect for those who have been here a bit longer?
Edit: Thank you, i think Ill need to do the same. So who is off-topic now? GMG is!

 

Furrer don't be so rude. He's not lacking respect for noone.

 

Okay, guys, so I had thought this was a result originally of a mistranslation, but apparently it's a problem sourcing with Blizzard.

I'm going to opt with continuing reporting the build as it was seen at Blizzard HQ in Irvine and from what we heard from the lead devs on the project until we get confirmations from Blizzard that these units have changed.

Cavez saying that the Roach's air attack was an error is not enough for me. We heard nothing, absolutely nothing, about an error with the Roach.

 

/salute
I am right looking forward for more information from you and sc2forum... And then translate them into Chinese

 

Well I'm glad you took the time to discuss this mixup here.

I changed our news post to reflect he mistake. I apologize for having laid the blame on the wrong parties.

But we will continue to report the latest build as what we can confirm, and the changes being described just haven't been confirmed.

I don't understand how the Roach's air attack can be a "mistake" when I talked personally with Dustin about all of these units and that never came up in discussion.

 

Jon i think it will be very important to ask them IF they have used different builds and why, because it has lead to more than needed trouble in the community (and between members ).

 

The real problem was that the two sites reporting inconsistencies were not actually present at any of these conferences as far as I'm aware. So to me the problem had arisen on these sites and not in the China build itself. I was clearly mistaken on that front, so I've changed my stance a bit.

The situation has been clarified but the proper course of action is simply to focus on the build that we've been shown until further confirmation filters in from Blizzard.

 

Ok, but this forum asks Blizzard questions once in a while right?
We should ask them what happend trought out those days, because as i mentioned before, it really made it hard to understand the Zerg (in some ways).

 

hmm... where do people get information now, did all those sites get information from this site?

 

Does it mean that Dts use the same energies as the HT if it is then they're the same basically. I forgot what the energies were called.

 

Khala? Psi?