Terran is not OP - I'll prove it.

Terran WERE imba. I say not so much anymore. Terran mech were far too power before the nerfs.

 

funny how I never thought terran was imba, especially their mechs, all you really need to do is mass zerglings, and roaches with a couple of hydras, and it should be enough to overwhelm them. The only strong thing from terran in my opinion (i know its not right) is MMM, those with good micro, i get owned. i need casters to counter MMM.

 

i thought their mechs were too weak, that's why thors got an upgrade. tanks were nerfed a bit. but the main strat was almost always M&M&M. didn't see much mech play until recently.

 

Remember this is still a Beta. So, for the released version, I shall not agree with you - Terran is stronger than all. If using it we could go over BattleNet - I will be happy to be wrong ( you have to prove it ). In SC 1 I played with all races, game has changed a lot and at the same time hasn`t changed much, Terran is stronger than the others because most maps have cliffs and when you have cliffs and a new unit like the Reapers...Terran got too much power in its defence, the game should offer the Protoss and Zerg an alternative to overcome this deffence and cliff play. They have not. In the past - Terran was considered unbeatable on Lost Temple, until I killed the guy saying that 4 times in a row. Protoss had the Corsair Disruption web - it unpowered the tanks and building the Fleet beacon there made the opposite side think you go for carriers Zerg could go with 10-12 Queens and still remove the tanks. But now, how shall we battle tanks on cliffs now?