Starcraft 2 Looks (visual appearance)

To balance it out a tad the fake ones would cost resources.

 

What do you think that the siege tanks its also a ground transport for infantry units.
marines will go 3x faster

 

yeah, forgot about the tank... It does look kinda cheap. I'm sure they will change that a bit. I'm sure a lot of things will look a lot different by release.

 

no man... you played a 10 year old game. thumbs down to you. i'd like to see you try to design a cool game like starcraft, the uniqueness of it, with the primitive technology 10 years ago. owerdown:

 

10 Years ago is high tech compared to us, 510 years ago.

 

*sigh* no it isn't. 10 years ago, we though we'd have today's technology in 50 years.

 

Project Revolutions 3D Siege Tank > StarCraft 2's 3D Siege Tank

And the PR one is probably less polys cause its for the WC3 engine.

 

Project Revolution's Siege Tank I admit is better looking.

 

I actually like SC2's graphic.

I really love how every units look is very detailed. Take a look at the Zealot for example. It really has a personality feel to it. Compared to SC1's Zealot, the Zealot in SC2 just looks in every way superior. You can say the exact same thing to the new Marine and BattleCruiser. I also hated SC1's Dragoon look. I don't know why soo many people loved it, but I personally think that it looked soo goofy and not futuristic. Immortals and Stalkers looked soo much better in every way.

The only thing I really don't like, and I think should be changed is the Siege tanks and Soul Hunters.
Siege Tanks are actually fine during regular mode. But when they transform into Siege tank, YUCK.
Soul Hunter simply looks too goofy for a Protoss unit. Protoss are suppose to be religious and honorable warriors. Soul Hunter looks like criminals. It actually suits Terran more. They simply need a new model for the Soul Hunter.

Other than those 2 complaints, I absolutely love the new SC2 engine and graphic.

 

It seems to me that Blizz is working on the Protoss look a bit more than anything else right now. That would explain why they are releasing info on them first. I think when they start displaying the other races they will look a bit more polished.

 

Glad to hear that, i think the Protoss buildings look ehh... Undetailed in the demo. Might just be because they havent worked so much on the buildings there.

 

There are like 2 other threads discussing this.

 

Many threads talking about the same thing.


Btw. Whats that Power level thing?

 

They better fix those buildings. Seriously, which is better?
StarCraft 2
[img width=174 height=181]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/yoda_24/gatewaysc2.jpg[/img]
Project Revolution (mine)
[img width=154 height=146]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/yoda_24/Gateway.jpg[/img]
StarCraft
[img width=200 height=150]http://sysd.org/hybrid/starcraft/gateway.gif[/img]

 

StarCraft II looks ooooooooo so much btr, im worried about the terrain doodads.

 

it's just a popularity thing don't worry about it.

Anyway to get back on topic I think it looks fine and SC2 looks much better Paragon

 

Why cause it shines? It's so undetailed and plain and cartoony. And it looks like its straight out of WarCraft 3 except more shiny like some ancient magical elven temple or something.

 

i llike the one you make, its so cool

 

No it just looks better IMO especially if you look at the animated pic on the website. How would you make it more interesting and detailed?

 

Make it look more like the original SC one.