Red Alert 3

lawl tsunami tank. good old westwood. But whose manning this game again? I remember EA swallowing up westwood and then ruining the last C&C game, it wasn't much fun for me ;\

 

lool wow ea still at it with milking up the cnc franchise till nothing remains but a smoldering pile of sh!t, You think they could had atleast make it not so much like Generals (hell they are even reusing units from that game, via overlord tank) :

 

You gotta hand it to EA to ruin a legendary franchise that would've made history.

 

A quote from me when Westwood was overtaken by the EA machine
"DAMN YOU EA!!! DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL!!! NOT RED ALERT!!! ... KHAN... KHAN"
lol
hopefully the will not ruin my favorite, (Sorry starcraft) rts ever with their usuall EA destructive sequence
at least the advertismentsare amusing, but the game better no hit consoles or it will destroy the series

 

Tankman, use spell check. Also, read the previous posts.

"Not surprisingly, it's headed for the Xbox360 as well."

 

producers are Westwood

and ill just say.....
OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG

RA3 is here after a long time!

i already pawned Yuri multiple times.......

questionably, the tsunami tank is like the sonic tank from red alert - eagle red

 

Yuri was so good, especially when they gave tanya auto fire instead of RA1's manual click fire which was a bunch of balogny

 

Ugg... Seriously? On the console? I know EA is a money hog but why would they go to limits to accually try to make their games suck? First of all, the 360's only bound to play simple RTS at most, such as Halo Wars. RA3 probably needs you to micro and macro a lot... The analog sticks are just way to annoying.

 

Which is why they're dumbing down the game.

 

why dont they listen to the consumers and leave it for the PC? why do they wanna dumb the game even more?

it'll be gay if sc2 goes on xbox 360...

 

Actually EA did make a good RTS. Their Battle for Middle Earth series surprised me how good they were, although simple.

 

I think I know how this will end:

[img width=373 height=535]http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6623/commandandretardkl1.jpg[/img]

Best I could do in 3 minutes, but I think you get the idea!

 

Why else? They make more money that way. Making games is not about how good they are, but how many people will buy them

 

That's exactly why EA sucks. They don't make games for the sake of making games. They make it to make money. So instead of building consumer loyalty, they built consumer disloyalty.

 

last time I checked that's how things worked in Real life

Real sucks

 

taht still doesnt change the fact that we dont like it when they are putting their "micro-intense" games on a console...d00d, there isnt enough buttons to even micro effectively. let alone, you cant really micro in the first place.

tahts y blizzard are 0rsm =]

 

bfme was the only good series EA ever made. But remember EA SPort's success has nothing to do with EA

 

EALA made BFME, not EASports. EASports was decent imo.

 

i know, i'm saying EA wasn't very successful even though they made a huge variety of games. Ea Sports was successful however but they're a completely different company

 

It's not really that EA as a whole weren't successful, they made a ton of money from their games. It's just that their games suck and their average sales per game and ratings are low.