Multiple endings

Multiple endings are irritating, because you need re-play the game to see alternative one, otherwise you cannot sleep normally...

 

Yes I agree. I hate that.

 

I like the way the origanal starcraft story was laid out and how it all ended and left you hanging. changing the current format would upset me, but i would still buy and play the game

 

BUMP

 

No, only one ending should be used. Just my opinion.

 

A multiple ending messes up the whole story.
Multiple ways/missions to get to the same end also tend to mess up. Also the fact that when you discuss the story with others, they might have taken another path is annoying, cause you will have to play it all over to get that little piece of story.

I would much rather enjoy a really epic long story with no more than 1 to 3 bonus missions... like in the original SC and warcraft 3.

I just feel that the whole concept of multiple story plots looks good on the paper, but is only chaos in reality.

 

The ending should be only 1 of course, BUT I think it would be great if Blizz were to add some secondary missions with funny things or relevant lorewise things. It would also add a certain replayability to the campaign.

 

i think that there should be atleast 2 multi-endings for every campaign (i cant spell) i.e on the terran they i can think of 2

1.) Jim avenges protoss guy (the one that wuz killed in BW by kerrigan)
2.) Jim is lost forever within the grasps of the zerg and becomes like kerrigan

 

Multiply endings, would totally finish the game, no expansion could be incluced (only with more happenings)
This would make a right mess of the storyline: for example in your case Kerrigan is dead, but in some's She rules the world, and every character would have a different role.

Gah no way, only one ending for one game please..!

 

well said...very well said
i h8 coming to a climax of epic proportions only to realize theres a few more behind it...

 

One ending, I wan't to see kerrigan dead

 

anyway,if you make multiple ending smean it might delay the realse of strc2 by maybe,1 year.so i think it would not have multiple endings.

 

I hope so. And I don't want Kerrigan to die.

 

there only gonna be one ending but i think that the path to that ending will be different

 

I think so too. You will be able to take different paths, but you'll always end up with the same ending.

 

yea like you assault char rather than aiur or w/e

actually i think that certain planets that are very important are going to be locked until a certain objective is complete like idk controlling 4 planets so you can create an army

 

I hate games with multiple endings because it screws up continuty an leaves you asking "Well what really happened and what is a dream from a megalomaniac?"

One thing that I can suppport though is if they were to do it where the campaigngs are not linealr but instead each race has their campaighn take place at the same time then each ending is race specific showing them meeting their ultimate objective but with there still being one overall winner or even just a stalemate.

Think C&C3 ending GDI ending was we beat the crin butNod saved a tower and now its just sitting there. Nod ending is We saved a tower now Kane is going through it. Scrin ending is we are screwed the brass has left through the last remianing tower. Each race achieved it opjectives and thus "won" but inthe ned there was still a tower left standing.

 

multiple endings would mean it would be almost impossible to start the expansion pack or SC3 T.T

 

No, it wouldn't. They always pick some ending and continue by it. I think it's stupid.

 

ehh yeah, and what about the other endings then? you are forced to play other storyline.. No point of doing it