Diablo3 rant on the Battle.Net Forums...

Haha, best one.

I provide superficial viewpoints, while your viewpoints are only based on interviews and videos.
You blame me for claiming to know what the feel of the game will be like, while you write pages yourself about the same topic.
You ask me how closely I have been following Diablo3, while you obviously didn't play Diablo2 much, whilst it has been released for a decade now...

Haha.
Do you only realise that the more you talk and the less believable you become?

Your faith in everything official provided by Blizzard is really strange all the same... Is this a kind of religion or more of partnership? Coupled with the facts that you are so available and responsive and talkative on this forum, and that you invariably bounce on everybody critisizing any bit of any official news of the developer, that is really peculiar when you think about it...

 

I like how you throw the stone and hide the hand. What do you mean with all of that? That he's some sort of cultist working for Blizzard to defend it against haters or something? He's just someone who, like me, happens to really like the Diablo franchise, and happens to periodically check all the news about it and is very informed.
And while he has, post after post, given solid evidence as to why auto-stats will NOT affect character customization and will not ruin the game at all, you just bash at his apparent fanaticism
And by the way, quoting you:
''I provide superficial viewpoints, while your viewpoints are only based on interviews and videos.''

Rrrright, so all we know about SC2 is BS because.. its based on QA Patches and interviews with Karune!! Come on now..

Anyway, I like having you around. You spice up the forums D:

 

Ok, so another guy who just understand the part that suits him.
Shall I take it that this discussion is totally pointless?

I was just trying to reply to the other users, but seemingly itzawhatnot takes everything here for him, so if he is not a cultist, shall I take it that he belongs to some sort of aristocracy here, which would provide him the self-proclaimed right to approve and disapprove everything that suits him or not, and that any comment addressed directly to him (omg) will instantly summon his court around?

To be honest, the more it goes and the less I like to have me around here: it sounds pretty obvious now that the game will not be released before at least six months, and that most pieces of news is then contradicted by another next one, and certain things in the game mechanics are not really defined yet for sure. Not that I can't understand a game concept cannot be perfect on the first shot, but just that the more it goes and the more it looks like that to post comment here is just like playing with ourself: while you have no real game around to enjoy, you just takes news and interviews and videos etc for real, which is a bit, well... not safe I would say, if took it too seriously and too often...

 

You, you've right. It's foolish for me to base what I'm saying off of what the devs have said. How could I have been so stupid? Anyone in their right mind would just have to hear that auto-Stats have been introduced to know that it's bad. I mean, it's not like everything else has also progressed or that auto-Stats are only half the equation or anything. How stupid of me(!)

And yes, regardless of how you're predicting the game to be, you're still being hypocritical. Also, I love how you always play the 'you always think you're right' card, when you're clearly subject to it as well, and on top of that, how you try and create rules for other players, like saying it's too early to know what the game will be like, and then not only saying what you supposedly 'know' the game will be like, and while doing so paying no acknowledgement to anything the devs have said, which already covers a lot of your concerns.

And yes, an opinion based on what the devs have said is a lot more informed than one that's only heard that there will be auto-Stats.

Nice assumption, and nice way to avoid the question. Too bad the assumption's wrong, and that you clearly don't know an awful lot about Diablo2 as a whole. So how closely have you been following?

Again, a nice and superficial statement. Care to back yourself up or do you just resort to stuff like this because you know you can't?

If by faith you mean, I-actually-read-about-what-they-have-implemented-and-why-before-forming-uninformed-viewpoints, then yes. And no, I don't just bounce on anyone criticising Blizzard, I just give my opinion, and if you think that my opinion's always sided with Blizzard, then this is just another clear example of you just choosing what you want to hear, and therefore, say, while not looking at the big picture. And yes, when someone comes along with such a clear lack of understanding as you, here, yes, I'll reply. Why wouldn't I?

And again, nice post. I like the parts where you completely excluded everything that was being talked about. Quality trolling at its best.

You do realise you're on a public forum, right? Sheesh, first you tried to stop everyone talking about Diablo because it's a StarCraft forums, and now you're trying to privatise it? Seriously, if no-one's able to correct or comment on anything that others have said, there would only ever be two members per discussion.

Just thought I'd point out some more hypocrisy.