1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Battle.net for Starcraft 2

Discussion in 'General StarCraft 2 Discussion' started by danhillman693, May 29, 2007.

Battle.net for Starcraft 2

  1. paragon

    paragon Guest

    Default: SCV

    Marine, Goliath, Siege Tank, Ghost, Battlecruiser, Raynor
    Zealot, Immortal, Dark Templar, High Templar, Mothership, Zeratul
    Zergling, Hydralisk, Mutalisk, Yet to be revealed caster unit, yet to be revealed really cool unit, Kerrigan
     
  2. coalescence

    coalescence New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I haven't got the slightest clue of what you're trying to say, but Goliaths haven't been confirmed yet.
     
  3. [LightMare]

    [LightMare] New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    570
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    is it the standard amount of wins? 25-150-350-750-1500?
     
  4. paragon

    paragon Guest

    yeah something like that ElemenTT

    I was suggesting unit pics for the win icons coalescence
     
  5. coalescence

    coalescence New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Ok, nevermind then :)
     
  6. MrFrancko

    MrFrancko New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    225
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Call me crazy and I could be wrong but it would be nice if there were rankings and rewards for getting records for scores people get in games. I'd like to see what really good players are able to achieve when it comes to their scores at the end of a game. Would give me more incentive to mine more resources and keep my units alive.
     
  7. paragon

    paragon Guest

    People with high scores don't necessarily win and they don't necessarily do the most for their team in terms of winning the game. In one WarCraft 3 4v4 I played, my entire team said that our side won because of me. I had burned two of the enemy bases to the ground and was the only one of the four of us that could field an entire army at the end of the game so when my army and the few units my allies had along with their heroes fought the enemy's army, we completely destroyed them so they gave up cause everyone had run out of minerals by then anyways. However, when it came to scores, I was in 4th place (third on my team). So, while everyone agreed that I had been the reason we won, I didn't have the highest score.
    Granted, scores on WC3 are skewed because of the heroes and my hero wasn't as high a level as theirs.

    I've also gotten the highest score in the game and lost even in 1v1 games.
     
  8. MrFrancko

    MrFrancko New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    225
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Yeah, if they were to implement incentives to get high scores, I would say that the scores would have to be based on different things than SC1
     
  9. Finn

    Finn Guest

    I really hope that blizzard do something against all kinds of hacks on the coming SC2. Very hard penaltys for those who hacks. They destroy the beauty of this game and shouldn't be on B.Net...
     
  10. MrFrancko

    MrFrancko New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    225
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I also hope that they include permanent alliances. I don't know how many times i've played a long game and won it but someone on my team decides to be a dick and turn allied victory off. It takes forever to figure out who it is and there is just too much finger pointing. Hell yeah i'm going to build up an army in case someone is planning on backstabbing everyone.
     
  11. SirBaron

    SirBaron New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    574
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Yeah that totally sucks. It was actually backstabbing that made me stop playing b.net, sadly.
     
  12. paragon

    paragon Guest

    While I'm sure they will have permanent alliances (like WC3) it was so fun to go into those comp stomp games (which I think are stupid ways that people use to get tons of quick wins and is a generally retarded concept) and turn people against each other once the comp is destroyed.
    "OMG WTF ALLY VIC!"
    "EVERYONE ALLY VIC"
    "come on i have to go soon"
    "i think its red look at his army"
    "omg red attacked my units"
    -everyone kills red-

    I hate the people who do those games and turning them against each other was so easy.
     
  13. MrFrancko

    MrFrancko New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    225
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I never did vs comp games just to get wins. I just liked going into them if I didn't have much time and I wanted to play really quick. I'm a pretty casual gamer in that respect.
     
  14. [LightMare]

    [LightMare] New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    570
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    you vs. comp doesn't get you wins though. you need other players too
     
  15. Space Pirate Rojo

    Space Pirate Rojo New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    3,067
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Canada, eh?
    I was talking with friends, some of my theories come from these discussions, if you could buy one time permanent upgrades in an B.Net store for your troops.
    Exchange 30 points earned from 6 wins for a permanent +7 health bonus to your Terran Marines.
    +2 Damage for Protoss Zealots, etc.

    Little bonuses you get for winning that you buy from a store accessible from any chat channel.
     
  16. [LightMare]

    [LightMare] New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    570
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    but then it's like an RPG, so new people get slaughtered :(
     
  17. Space Pirate Rojo

    Space Pirate Rojo New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    3,067
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Canada, eh?
    You'd only be able to buy the upgrade once.
    And it would just be a slight improvement.
    A sliver.
     
  18. [LightMare]

    [LightMare] New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    570
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    well yeah, i guess, but that makes it that much more complicated. however, we live in hope. it would be awesome if that could happen
     
  19. paragon

    paragon Guest

    Thats dumb.

    And COMPLETELY ruins game balance.
     
  20. PowerkickasS

    PowerkickasS New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    776
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    someone should do that. rts rpg lolwtf
    and comp wins/losses do affect ur stats lol