worst idea for starcraft2

i was resorting my bookmarks, and found one for this old thread, when i clicked it, i discovered the thread itself was deleted in the move though(just like the protoss reproduction one) so i decided to create a new thread



what do you think is the worst idea(or just generally a bad idea) forum members/blizzard/other people have come up with?

 

-Changing the colossus
-I sure hope they incorporate some new death animations into SC2 or allow you to turn the old ones on because i currently don't like how the Colossus and other big units just die in a big ball of fire
-I hate the infestor look i hope they decide to change the look of it

 

Completely making a ***** out of the Thor.

 

putting my beloved Lurkers at Tier 3.5(you have to morph the Hydralisk Den into the Lurkers one only after you have a Hive) i want my lower Tiered Lurkers back!!!!

 

I personally dont think a speed boost for zerg units on creep is fair. That means you could have units that were not placed strategically in your base to defend properly and they could be at your attackers in a second. your forcing players to think less about unit placement and more about just massing units. instead of Micromanaging the ones you have to gain the most of out them.

I also feel the the phase cannons shouldn't have to go back down and then up again to shoot. i'm not sure if they changed that or not but they braught down the attack speed of the phase cannon significantly it seemed in 1 video.

 

Condensing it to one game and one expansion.

 

Making it 3 times as expensive

 

they have said that they are working on another look for the Infester, so far we have not seen it and we dont know if they will decide that they like the old one better to use for the game.

 

Ya i think i saw that too but right now that's just one of my biggest factors that i don't like.

 

150$ instead of 100$ is three times more expensive? You have some mathematical errors there. The game will probably only be 50% more expensive overall (not including inflation which would make it about 20$) but that is easily justified by the increased cost of making this game and the extra content.

 

From 50!! And your inflation figures dont make any sense at all.

 

its release date! TO LONG! LOL

 

Um...
I'm a forum member right?

-Not deleting this thread
-Canceling StarCraft II
-Delaying its release date, again

 

Yes they do according to the CPI Inflation Calculator. Either way, 50 =\= 300 so how dare you tell me I'm wrong at math?

 

THIS.

THe changes to the Mothership are up there though.

 

The worst thing in my mind, is adding the Queen, the Thor, and the Mothership. The second worst thing is allowing to buy gas for minerals.

 

Ya i really don't like the gas mineral mechanic I think they should change it back to the original way because it made things alot easier to keep track of.

 

Why do you hate those 3 units? Personally, the queen is my favorite addition to the zerg. They're not super units anymore! Take out the queen, and the zerg would have just 2 ability casters, the infestor and the overseer. Of which only the infestor would have a skill that deals damage to enemy units. Would you rather the zerg have the old queen back?

 

^ I kind of would like the old Queen back (big and kickass) but just make her expensive enough to discourage producing more than a few.

 

I meant old queen as in the SC1 version, as DarkTemp hates the current queen due to its fanbased super unit status.

So they took a unit noone used, made it useful, and all DarkTemp has to say about it is its a stupid idea.