What must be done

Discussion in 'General StarCraft 2 Discussion' started by Wishdale, May 25, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

What must be done

  1. Wishdale

    Wishdale Guest

    1: Change the looks of the siege tank. It looks like something you get in a mc donalds happy meal. Just Stupid
    2: When will the battle cruiser become a real battle cruiser? It is just rediculous with it's por lazer shot. Give it more firepower, a few rocket launchers, more small lazers etc. Decrease the damage on each canon or increase the cost.
    Otherwise: change the name to space lazer canon... Battlecruiser (haha)
     
  2. GuiMontag

    GuiMontag New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    636
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I agree with the siege tank, the animation for changing is not crash hot aswell.
    Cant comment on damage because everything like that will go through 10000 changes by the time blizzard releases the game
     
  3. markus

    markus New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    40
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Yes, the siege tank looks like a toy. It's too round a plastic looking. The marine shields look dodgy like this too.
    A lot of people are complaining about the siege tanks, I hope blizzard listens.

    Battlecruisers look crap when they die. They just fall apart... come on! They could at least explode honorably or something. Their yamato gun is weaker now I think but it takes less time to charge. Maybe shorter cooldown as well? Would you prefer stronger and longer cooldown or weaker and shorter?
     
  4. mc2

    mc2 New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    972
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    to me the siege tank looks nice, especially the siege mode, looks poweful

    but yeah the firepower of the battlecruiser needs to be upgraded, i propose giving the Valkyrie's rockets to the BC!
     
  5. orphean

    orphean New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    163
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Give them fighters, missiles, turrets, SOMETHING. Battlecruisers have always blown chunks. All these minerals to destroy pylons ::)
     
  6. Fenix

    Fenix Moderator

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,769
    Likes received:
    11
    Trophy points:
    0
    I think the BCs look sweet when they die.....
     
  7. reject_666_6

    reject_666_6 New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    573
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    If all or most of the other ships in the game are changed considerably, the Battlecruiser (and probably Wraith) are going to continue to play their familiar roles that everybody is used to, and that's a big bonus in strategy making. I think that a few things have to change, but some things just have to stay the same for the time being.
     
  8. orphean

    orphean New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    163
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Yeah but strategies are against some known factor. With all the new air units the protoss have any old strategies with wraiths & battlecruises will have to be reworked at the least, or completely abandoned at worst. This game is going to be so different from SC1 that I'm going to go out on a limb and say that 99% of all the old strategies will have to at least be modified.
     
  9. reject_666_6

    reject_666_6 New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    573
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    :'( I like Battlecruisers
     
  10. PlatnumCy

    PlatnumCy New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    27
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    1
    I think the new bunkers look like crap as well
     
  11. orphean

    orphean New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    163
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Why's that? The 'plastic'ey look?
     
  12. reject_666_6

    reject_666_6 New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    573
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I don't like how Bunkers look either. They should get larger windows so that you can actually see the units move around and fire from inside.
     
  13. PlatnumCy

    PlatnumCy New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    27
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    1
    well...y not just keep the original round toped bunkers!? they looked awesome
     
  14. Bumbaloe

    Bumbaloe New Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    213
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Because, as far as I can tell, everything is getting upgraded graphics-wise.
     
  15. hillzagold

    hillzagold New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    796
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
  16. ZerglingRUSH

    ZerglingRUSH New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    48
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I'd like them to make the missile turrets look more like the original too. It looks too cartoonish!
     
  17. mc2

    mc2 New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    972
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    they will probably make the size of units and structures more proportionally accurate.
    the command centre and barracks probably needs to be bigger, the starport will be much bigger because the battlecruiser is manufactured in there.
    a zergling is around the same size as infantry, hydralisk is bigger than infantry.
    i'm pretty sure there's gotta be new technologies in the year 2500, tanks were used since 1900s and probably should be replaced....
     
  18. hillzagold

    hillzagold New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    796
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    or given energy weapons, imagine a walking battlecruiser
     
  19. Fenix

    Fenix Moderator

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,769
    Likes received:
    11
    Trophy points:
    0
    Meh, I actually think we're at the pinnacle of terrestrial weaponry. You really can't get much better than a bullet or a tank shell for blowing large messy holes in things.
     
  20. mc2

    mc2 New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    972
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    whats about a neutron bomb or a hydrogen bomb?
    or those particle accelerators?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.