What don't you like so far about starcraft 2?

Discussion in 'General StarCraft 2 Discussion' started by surr, Jun 23, 2007.

?

What do you dislike the most about StarCraft 2

  1. Tempest replace carrier

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Siege tank's new look

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Phoneix replace scout and corsair

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. marines with shields

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. zergling to banelings

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. colossus

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. star relic replace arbiter

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. zealots charge

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. immortals replace dragoons

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. mothership

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  11. twlight archon

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  12. soul hunters

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  13. reapers replace firebat

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  14. portable phonton canons?

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  15. the fact their is a starcraft 2

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  16. Warp rays

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

What don't you like so far about starcraft 2?

Discussion in 'General StarCraft 2 Discussion' started by surr, Jun 23, 2007.

  1. surr

    surr New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    96
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I know its great and we are all excited but what don't you like about starcraft 2 so far...


    I personally dislike the tempest vs the carrier :upset:


    I added a poll if u think of more things ill add it on their :)
     
  2. [LightMare]

    [LightMare] New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    570
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    tempest rocks! aiur is destroyed, so not much fancy gold plating anymore. i don't really like the soul hunter, but it's really early to decide. they might change things on us.
     
  3. MrFrancko

    MrFrancko New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    225
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I chose the mothership because I don't see the need for a super unit in the SC universe. I know Blizz will manage to make the game even in the end but I think they didn't need to add it in the first place and are creating more work for themselves in the end.
     
  4. Itsmyship

    Itsmyship New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,164
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Where only cool people live... So Cal!
    I personally dislike the Colossus...it seems like a unit who's cost will override its usefulness
     
  5. SirBaron

    SirBaron New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    574
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Yes, i completely agree. I find it quite contradictory to claim "that starcraft is still a game where large armies fight against large armies" and then invent some stupid, extremely costly super unit that goes down with barely no effort and some skillful microing.
     
  6. capthavic

    capthavic New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    598
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Honestly, that SC2 isn't out yet. That's it.
     
  7. paragon

    paragon Guest

    I dislike soul hunters, tempests replacing carriers, the fact that someone voted "star relic replaces arbiter", and the simplistic textures on some buildings and units.

    Just like the scout and the ultralisk
     
  8. PowerkickasS

    PowerkickasS New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    776
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    i was gonna pick warp rays but you didnt have that there
    so im definitely picking ugly looking siege tanks with their big fat-red-lips-looking cannontip.....
     
  9. PrivateJoker

    PrivateJoker New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    180
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    The thing I hate the most about Starcraft II is that it has not been released yet! 8)
     
  10. PrivateJoker

    PrivateJoker New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    180
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Actually I think the red lipped siege tanks are super sexy. Every time I see those tanks I jsut want to leap ontop of one of them and start making out with its cannon...those are some damn fine lips girl...i would say, and then the siege tank would blow my head off....THOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMBOOOOOOOM!
     
  11. PowerkickasS

    PowerkickasS New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    776
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    *vomit* lol :p
     
  12. [LightMare]

    [LightMare] New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    570
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    you've got a knack for double and triple posting....
    i doubt colossus will be that expensive. and just you wait, the mothership and colossus will smack you in the face, and you'll hate yourself for dissing them
     
  13. ZeiDjon

    ZeiDjon New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    18
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I simply cant understand why (some)people hate the fact that there is all these new units to SC2, this is not and Expansion, this is a sequel, and even though i really think there should have been a fourth race, i love that they try to keep the feel about SC1 and replacing most of the units with new units, that have abilities which wasnt in SC1, and the reason is new strategy new units that you have to learn how to "master", we all know how to play SC1, we even though we didnt get the fourth race i am looking forward to learn a hole new and different game, see you guys on Bnet... ;)

    ZeiDjon
     
  14. paragon

    paragon Guest

    There really should not ever be a fourth race. Ever.
    And they aren't replacing most of the units, they are replacing some of them.
    And nobody hates the fact that there are new units, they dislike the particular units because they do not seem useful/are stupid.
    For example. The Soul Hunter is stupid because it has a hoverboard. Hoverboards are stupid. Nobody would actually use something like that on a battlefield as they offer no protection whatsoever. It is more a tool for a scout unit to use but Soul Hunters are not scouts. Also, they look increasing stupid the more of them there are.

    I also dislike the new look of the siege tank.
     
  15. LoserInLosing

    LoserInLosing New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    42
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Siege Tanks Look Terrible look like toys from toys r us... wat were also terrible were the soul hunters.... getting stronger after fallen enemies??/ Where did that come from...
     
  16. paragon

    paragon Guest

    It's cause they suck out their soul. Or they just suck. One of those.
    Blizz really has to pick it up in the texture department. Maybe a few high poly bakes to liven them up.
     
  17. Ishe

    Ishe New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    24
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I think the mothership could be cool.. but its going to be tageted as soon as any1 sees in in a game they will just hammer it. I hope they dont change it to much more units would be cool though.
     
  18. PowerkickasS

    PowerkickasS New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    776
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    ingame reaper looked alrite
    but their portrait is lame

    dropship was alrite as well
    WHY DONT THE MAKE THE BATTLECRUISERS HUMONGOUS CARRIERS LIKE THEY'RE SUPPOSE TO BE ARRGGGHHHHHH
     
  19. paragon

    paragon Guest

    The terran barracks looks ugly. I mean, the model looks basically the same but it looks like it is glass and i'm going to break it.
     
  20. FlyingTiger

    FlyingTiger New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    736
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    CT
    haha man u r so critical of the texture

    everything will be alright in the end ^_^