Starcraft II LAN petition hits 100k sigs

Discussion in 'General StarCraft 2 Discussion' started by Fenix, Aug 18, 2009.

Starcraft II LAN petition hits 100k sigs

Discussion in 'General StarCraft 2 Discussion' started by Fenix, Aug 18, 2009.

  1. Fenix

    Fenix Moderator

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,769
    Likes received:
    11
    Trophy points:
    0
    The online petition combating the removal of LAN, an integral part of play from the original StarCraft, has hit one hundred thousand signatures. Now, obviously, this doesn't mean Blizzard will reconsider their position as, at heart, they are in business to make money. Blizzard has defended it's move to remove LAN play in a few ways, most notably due to anti-piracy measures, but also to 'ensure a quality multiplayer experience in StarCraft II.'

    As far as I can tell, Blizzard hasn't released a statement concerning this, and I'm fairly sure they won't, but one would think that at some point, they'd hear the voices of their fans, or, possibly more importantly, their customers.


    News via Kotaku.

    You can view and sign the petition here.
     
  2. ItzaHexGor

    ItzaHexGor Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,187
    Likes received:
    21
    Trophy points:
    38
    From:
    Sydney, Australia
    Actually, no, it's not most notably due to piracy. In fact, it's barely due to piracy at all. They've specifically stated that piracy isn't a big deal, and that they're combating it with their new installation process which requires you to login or create a Battle.Net account, and that the main way they're wanting to stop piracy is to create such a great Battle.Net experience people won't want to pirate it.

    The way I see it, they're lazy and can't be bothered putting the effort into making LAN, because they're forgetting that those who would otherwise be playing LAN would simply be playing private games on Battle.Net anyway.
     
  3. Fenix

    Fenix Moderator

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,769
    Likes received:
    11
    Trophy points:
    0
    They listed piracy first in their reasons they took out LAN in the report I read earlier.
     
    ronin2011 likes this.
  4. ItzaHexGor

    ItzaHexGor Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,187
    Likes received:
    21
    Trophy points:
    38
    From:
    Sydney, Australia
    Well that comes as a surprise. In the recent media release they basically said the opposite.

    Here and here.

    Particularly this;

     
  5. Simbob

    Simbob New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    481
    Likes received:
    2
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Australia
    Just signed now. Then right after i signed, in that .5 of a second, an additional 15 signatures were added.
     
  6. Lobsterlegs

    Lobsterlegs Guest

    I believe SC2 will have LAN, only that you have to log in to Bnet2.0 first.
    What's wrong with that?

    Most LAN's have internet.
     
  7. exe

    exe New Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    272
    Likes received:
    2
    Trophy points:
    0
    i think if blizzard decides to have sc2 with no lan because of piracy then i can understand it. Then im all up for it. Blizzard will make the new standards of tomorrow gaming :D Go blizzard you rox !! roxxoxoxoxox

    - No lan all the way :D
     
  8. 89th_shock_troop

    89th_shock_troop New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2009
    Messages:
    29
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    canada
    i just signed, 112526 signatures in total:yes:
     
  9. VeljkoM

    VeljkoM New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    75
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Serbia,KG
    Why would absence of LAN stop piracy? Even WoW is being pirated and hackers will find the way to remove any obstacle. In many counties piracy is legal and there are even shops that sell pirated games for very small praises.
     
  10. Kaaraa

    Kaaraa Space Junkie

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,335
    Likes received:
    3
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    United States
    Signature No. 112731

    There's no reason why SC2 shouldn't have LAN, period.
     
  11. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    ^^
    My words. Thats like removing cmd from windows.
     
  12. VodkaChill

    VodkaChill New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Messages:
    491
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    I shall agree with Furrer.

    Signed. 112913 Signatures Total
     
  13. freedom23

    freedom23 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,172
    Likes received:
    2
    Trophy points:
    0
    No LAN spells doom for people who have crappy net connections such as the great dial up. There is always the bizarre chance that even a shop could lose their internet connection for an instant, and that could majorly disrupt gamers worldwide. I also feel too lazy to go signing up in the net before being able to play, despite my enemy is just centimeters away from me... bummer.
     
  14. Ste

    Ste New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2008
    Messages:
    585
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Chicago
    It makes no difference to me whether or not a LAN option is included, but I signed it anyways..
     
  15. the8thark

    the8thark New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes received:
    4
    Trophy points:
    0
    If this was the case then LAN or no LAN would not be an issue for you, as you'd have been too lazy to have gone to the store to purchase the game or navigate to Blizzard.com to purchase the digital version.
     
  16. Gforce

    Gforce New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    887
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    I got signature number 121,382, awesome.