I don't like how sc2 is right now

Terrans:

-Nomad look like crap
-Predators look like something from Star Wars
-Thor doesn't shoot cannons/missiles and should be more "energy"
-Viking (ground) weapon is suppose to shoot until the enemy is dead
-Banshee...too much from C&C
-You can't deupgrade the Command Center if you advance it
-Siege Tanks can be overpowered so easily, in which sc, it was pretty strong
-Whear is da Science Vessals?
-The women who is suppose to be controlling the buildings looks like a man and it has the same face with Vikings
-Turrets aren't detectors anymore

Protoss:

-Mothership isn't super unit anymore
-One word...Reavers
-Zealots look stupid when running and doesn't stab when attacking
-Twilight Archon looks weak
-Team color...do I need to say more?
-Immortals cannot attack air (rumor)
-Carriers probably look like yellow crap
-Forge looks...well...ugly
-No more Arbitors...

Zerg:

-We know nothing about it except Nydus Worm, Zerglings, and Multalisk and banelings
-Zerglings look like grasshoppers that can't even fly and looks weak

 

To answer your "where are" questions, They are still being made. Remember that Starcraft 2 is still in its early stages of making.

 

-Nomad is the Science Vessal.
-Upgrading th CC is a tactical move that should be done with some thought
-The Viking face is temporary
-Turrets are made detector by the radar tower and radar dome

-Mother ship was almost impossible to balance as a super unite
-Reavers are a sad loss but are replaced with the colossus
-Twilight Archon are just as powerful as the old one and have the Dark Archons maelstrom
-Mothership is now the Arbitor

hope this can help a bit, i hope at least you enjoy SC2 as a final product.

 

i think they should make immortal anti air and anti ground. and make the stalker only anti ground. stalkers when microed very well (not that hard) is kinda imba specailly its multi purpose(attack air and ground units.).

they got rid of the dragoon because it was too powerful or the unit alone can take care of everything (shoots air and ground untis).. very massable, strong damage, enough hp etc.

i find the stalker similar with dragoons. although they have lower hp but still got blink fast attack speed, anti air and ground. they should do somthing about this unit.

 

IMO, the Reaver, although a powerful Protoss unit, it would look VERY ugly in 3D. I can't really imagine it. And to TerranGod, SC2 is still in production so just wait a bit. A lot of the things you complained about are temporary.

 

yea man wait till its final b4 saying "I DONT LIKE SC2 RYTE NOW"

 

Looks like just another ignorant rant to me.

Are we actually gonna discuss and speculate starcraft 2 here or just whine and complain about things in every thread?

I'm sorry if I seem rude or mean but I'm getting frustrated with this. We don't need 20 different threads that are all just complaints about things.

 

I've noticed that too, this is just a mass bitch about everything tread from the looks of it. but given who i am i still had to post my opinion. can't help it.

 

I call it keyboard diarrhea.

 

I call it a reason for abortion.

*edit*

Stalkers are fine as the goon replacement if you give the immortals air they'll be more massed than anything else. Imagine massed Immortals vs massed Battlecruisers, the immortals would win because of the hardened shields. Its better that it remains a ground only attacker. Could you imagine the siege tank able to fire at air units?

 

I don't really like Protoss....so there you go thats my opinion.Short and simple isn't it,really helps the eye from harmful text walls.

 

Terrans:

-Nomad look like crap - yes
-Predators look like something from Star Wars - kinda but you can only have so many different space ships
-Thor doesn't shoot cannons/missiles and should be more "energy" - his main attack is lazer cannons, and the energy attack is 250mm cannons? Idk anything about missles thought.
-Viking (ground) weapon is suppose to shoot until the enemy is dead. Maybe, but that would be a lot of wasted ammunition(as described in the marine unit web site on the official blizz site, where it says their guns are designed to fire in volleys to save ammo)
-Banshee...too much from C&C - its a ATG attack plane/chopper, they have similar designs to be effective.
-You can't deupgrade the Command Center if you advance it - which would make it imba otherwise imo.
-Siege Tanks can be overpowered so easily, in which sc, it was pretty strong - and in a way imba too. We dont know numbers yet
-Whear is da Science Vessals? - nomad
-The women who is suppose to be controlling the buildings looks like a man and it has the same face with Vikings - under development, you dont really thin it will stay that way do you?
-Turrets aren't detectors anymore - with radars they are

Protoss:

-Mothership isn't super unit anymore - hard to balance
-One word...Reavers - collosus
-Zealots look stupid when running and doesn't stab when attacking - they slice now, much better technique
-Twilight Archon looks weak - but is actually very powerful and has a special attack, last i heard it was feedback.
-Team color...do I need to say more? - a little less would indeed be nice
-Immortals cannot attack air (rumor) - and they shouldnt, thats where stalkers come
-Carriers probably look like yellow crap - no they are silver, much like tempests were
-Forge looks...well...ugly - no comment on that one, havent seen it
-No more Arbitors...- mothership for that for now.

 

I only wish they change the voice for the vikings...sounds like space cowboys in a robots,instate of horses.

 

You dont like Starcraft 2 Zerg because "We know nothing about it except Nydus Worm, Zerglings, and Multalisk and banelings"

Thats a pretty bad reason dude lol. Zerglings are weak too, lets face it, i wouldnt make 6 of them and think ive got a good chance of beating protoss.

I think most of the post was a little harsh, most of the opinions are the opinion of a minority. I just hope ya like the end product dude as i think most fans will.

 

In all fairness, if you don't like it by the time it comes out, don't buy it.

 

like, i dont want to be harsh or anything...but all this whining and complaining is really pissing me off!..

do u realise that sc2 is at its early stages... EARLY!!!

and besides you will always find a unit that comes from somewhere else ( eg banshee from C&C)...so fricken what!??!?! its not like blizzard will make a unit that u will never find from somewhere else...geez

people like u shouldnt have started to look at sc2 in the first place...u just start complaining about it even tho u know it will most probably not come out till late next yr...so stop f**king complaining...

if i offended u...im sorry. but i just wanted to tell u guys that sc2 is still in alpha stage...have u seen sc1 in alpha stage? rofl...ull be like "wtf is this? lol! 1996 overlords can attack?!?! drones fly? wth!"

well yeah, sc2 new units IMO are pretty cool. seriously!... u dont want sc2 to be a sc1 but good graphics.

 

TerranGod, it sounds to me as if you just want to play more SC1. The reason that a lot of the old units were scrapped/replaced was because this is Starcraft TWO, not a prettier version of the original. Now I agree with a few things (such as the Nomad being hideous), but much of what you commented on was losing some of the old unit, or nitpicking about how certain units don't look or act like they did in SC1. Things are guaranteed to change, and frankly I'm happy that they're willing to scrap various units to bring a fresh feeling to the game rather than keep them just because of some nostalgic people.

I say if you want to use the Reaver and other scrapped units, go play the original.

 

No one agree that the viking sounded awful?I'm a bit disappointed with myself but I guess its ok...

 

it sounded odd, like a less angry Vulture.

 

i hate that...they try to sound tough