Billy versus Dimaga

Discussion in 'StarCraft 2 Maps, Replays, Modding' started by kuvasz, Sep 24, 2010.

Billy versus Dimaga

  1. kuvasz

    kuvasz Corrections Officer

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    5,143
    Likes received:
    15
    Trophy points:
    38
    From:
    Hungary
  2. Xern

    Xern New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    88
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    That's hardly a proof of Terran being OP. Billy did play better macro-wise, sure, but he made some serious blunders in contrary to Dimaga.

    - On a few occasions he mismanaged his units badly, examples being losing a lot of drones to a few vikings (i guess around 25 min.), losing units that were in "hold position" mode, or losing mutas to missile turrets (33 min. i believe)

    - He had a lot of bases, but only about half saturated, so his economical edge was a lot smaller than it appeared.

    - He didn't apply enough pressure, he was too much in defense mode.

    - Billy fought battles suprisingly bad. It started from bad positions (at chokes). After engaging he realised he was at disadvantage so he tried to retreat, losing a ton of units for free. That happened on many occasions. If he attacked on open fields, possibly using nydus, and tried to get a surround, this would have looked differently.

    - He had a problem with marauders microing, a few fungal growths would have worked wonders.

    - He didn't spread creep enough.

    - There were long periods when he had a lot of larvas, a lot of minerals but he didn't make any units. Suprising with his high enough APM.

    - Instead of getting so many ultras, he could have made BL's. He made them, but only a few and he didn't have almost any AA, so a few vikings took care of them. If he made corruptors + BL's + infestors for fungal growth he would decimate Dimaga's forces.

    IMO.
     
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2010
  3. TastyTreat

    TastyTreat New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Messages:
    64
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Vanity Ruins
    I think the main thing we can take away from the replay is. A zerg player has to play a near perfect game to compete. I do find it pretty ridiculous how much protoss and terran can get out of 1 base for the longest time. When i play it feels if i dont take my Natural i pretty much stand no chance.

    Props to both players for a good game, but on another note screw terran and protoss, i await the day when zerg is fixed.
     
  4. DarkCommander

    DarkCommander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    118
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Canada
    Hehe, terran can play 3 base vs zerg 7. Thats because of mules and because zerg often just send wave after wave at terran while terrans will hit and run. In that game dimaga did a great job snipping the ultralisks. I mean you can't pop out infinit ultras so dimaga just sniped them until it was the good moment to attack.
     
  5. kuvasz

    kuvasz Corrections Officer

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    5,143
    Likes received:
    15
    Trophy points:
    38
    From:
    Hungary
    I'm not saying the Zerg player didn't make mistakes but really, if your opponent has twice as many bases as you they should roflstomp you with 0 micro. Okay, not all his expansions were saturated, so make that 4-5 against 2-3... meh.