Battlestar vs Basestar

Discussion in 'Space Junk' started by TheWorker, May 3, 2008.

?

Battlestar and Basestar, who wins?

  1. Battlestar

    2 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. Basestar

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

Battlestar vs Basestar

Discussion in 'Space Junk' started by TheWorker, May 3, 2008.

  1. TheWorker

    TheWorker Guest

    Battlestar vs Basestar who would win? (without using several tonnes of nukes)
     
  2. Operational

    Operational New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Messages:
    45
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Battlestar. IIRC there are a few instances in the show that prove this.
     
  3. ijffdrie

    ijffdrie Lord of Spam

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    5,725
    Likes received:
    17
    Trophy points:
    38
    deathstar
     
  4. TheWorker

    TheWorker Guest

    Imo, I think that Battlestar would rape any basestar if it was to attack first. Jump in + one salvo from its foward batteries = cylon soup. However I think that it lacks other ship to ship equipment. So if you decide to place two basestars at both sides of the battlestar its pretty much f*cked. Not that it would get immidietly destroyed, no, exremely strong armoring and the barrage guns provide some resistance to missiles but basestars exhanged their maneuverability for extremely large space and therefore can throw thousands of missiles in very fast fashion. But without its forward guns it either has to turn, or rely on nukes/weaker side turrets or vipers.
     
  5. SubTachyon

    SubTachyon Guest

    Agree. Battlestar is an excellent assault ship and Basestar is more of an oldschool mothership. I think that in longer battles basestar might have some advantage since they can carry sheer number of missiles and raiders and battlestars themselfs arent that big of a threat anymore with the moment of surprise gone.